BrianW

They have also provided a profile for each airframe here for those of us who are lazy: https://forums.flightsimlabs.com/topic/36606-simbrief-profiles/

Boeing offers several licensing options, my understanding is that PMDG has the simulator data license, not just a license for the logos and names.

Thanks for the fix, I just had these appear for me too.

Not only that, but of all things heart disease was a contributing factor in Richard Simmons death at only 76! So yeah there's certainly other factors at play.

Not in 2020 though. Maybe someone who has it in 2024 could share the options?

I've had it happen to me once prior to the 2024 compatibility update, I just assumed it was bad weather data (rapid wind shift, or OAT spike) messing it up.

Waiting for refueling to complete is the way it always works for me. I wasn't aware it had an option to board while refueling, but thanks I'll check it out. My OTP will get a lot better for those A321 flights with a large fuel uplift.

One thing that the FSLabs had in P3d was the ability to set a specific time to start boarding. I really wish this was an option with the Fenix, or at least to be able to separate fueling from boarding. The ability to board while refueling, or wait for awhile after fueling before boarding would be nice.

Are you sure you're not trying to use the key for the baggage door? Sorry, I couldn't resist as someone who's done it a few times IRL. 😁

It doesn't even work like that these days, everything is in a distributed and virtualized environment. It also could be that the volume of network traffic is just too high with everyone trying at once, more servers would just make that worse.

I'm going to state the obvious but your email password and your steam password are different I hope. Email is the key to many things, so it's important that the password for that is different from anything else, same applies for bank accounts.

It's nice to see the ADIRS and ACP models will be updated too.

I won't be impressed until I can play as a bird, but in the meantime I'd settle for in game ATIS that reports the correct sky conditions, and dewpoint.

Interesting, I didn't realize GSX modified payload. I thought it was visual only so I never bothered paying much attention to whether they matched. I'll need to try this.

I wish I could go unnoticed at work for that long, I would be taking a lot more 3 day weekends.

+1 for this, I had the exact same issue and decided to do the same thing once I realized I really don't need my chair to roll at all.

LOL, a nice way to say DDOS. https://cybersecuritynews.com/ddos-attack-microsoft-azure/

Yes, and Yes. The CDN selects the best server to connect to based on your IP address, if you're connecting via a VPN it will use that IP which may be less that ideal. There's also overhead with a VPN that you wouldn't have otherwise. The only reason I would use a VPN is if the connection to the Azure network was messed up with my ISP, and even then it would be a temporary thing until it was fixed.

Mi novia es colombiana necesito probar esto lol

In HDG mode and not TRK perhaps?

I'm seeing this too, according to the gauges it's off, but sound, heat effects, fuel usage still occur.

Sorry, I should clarify that it's only on aircraft that offer it. At this point I pretty much only use aircraft that have detailed systems and failures, I've found I get bored too quickly with those that don't. That's why I'd gladly pay a higher price for something I'll use for years vs. a cheaper less detailed one that I'll never use again after the newness wears off.

No worries, but that was an important detail to leave out since ECON is the more common mode. The route length is also important because there are differences in the FMC OPT calculations between short flights (<400 NM) and long ones, but again only in ECON mode.. LRC differs from ECON in that the OPT altitude is only based on aircraft weight. Do you remember what the winds were? Maybe you just lost a good portion of tailwind at the lower altitude.

I’ve been around along time too and It does seem like that at times, and I’ve seen more than a few people with a lot of real world experience get scared away because of the “your post count is low so you don’t know anything” argument. Maybe we both need to start padding our post count with a bunch of “I agree”, or “+1” posts. :rolleyes: As for your page 16 question: Failures allow a deeper understanding on exactly how the systems and their backups are supposed to work. It also gives purpose to all the preflight tests you go through as opposed to just going through the motions. I only occasionally use the pre-programmed failures, and when I do it’s usually only on local flights, or to try an ETOPS diversion. The random service based failures I use on every flight though. The chance of a failure using the random failures is pretty low, so there’s no reason not to expect to make it to your destination. When they do happen though it adds some variety as opposed to just droning along from point A to B on every flight.

Why LRC? ECON below a CI of 35 will give you better range than LRC if that’s what you’re looking for. A CI of 0 will give you the best range.