2 hours ago, rka said:

"We may add them someday"

"It's on my radar"

It's not much, but it's at least something. At least more than Goran has to offer with his third party spokesperson(?) for Ben. Thanks.

Maybe before you assume something, ask who the source is. But to expect that from you would be to expect too much. 
In any case, I’m sure I speak for everyone when I say we’re happy you got the information you needed. Even though it was “at least something”. 
Hope you’re enjoying being a customer of Laminar Research. Out of curiosity, Will you also add “Asobo customer” to your signature someday?  

1 hour ago, GoranM said:

Will you also add “Asobo customer” to your signature someday?

I can't imagine anyone so dissatisfied with X-Plane could ever touch any other flight sim without needing hospitalisation from shock and despair, let alone proudly state they tried it in their signature.

Edited January 27, 20233 yr by mSparks

2 hours ago, GoranM said:

Maybe before you assume something, ask who the source is.

Okay Goran. Who is Cameron XA and can he give official statements for Laminar Research?

37 minutes ago, rka said:

Okay Goran. Who is Cameron XA and can he give official statements for Laminar Research?

Not much of a laminar customer if you don’t know who Cameron is. 

1 minute ago, GoranM said:

Not much of a laminar customer if you don’t know who Cameron is. 

I know full well who Cameron is, and I know full well why you are dodging the actual question - whether he can make official statements for LR. Now can he?

Dodging the question?  I don’t have to dodge any questions you have. 

@rka and @GoranM, cut out the sniping will you and discuss the topic in a mature way.

The alternative is it gets locked.

Just now, Ray Proudfoot said:

@rka and @GoranM, cut out the sniping will you and discuss the topic in a mature way.

The alternative is it gets locked.

Maybe you could ask him to finally answer the question he so strongly denies to be dodging? 😄

3 minutes ago, rka said:

Maybe you could ask him to finally answer the question he so strongly denies to be dodging? 😄

1) I don't own XP.

2) Even if I did I'm not getting involved in your debate.

They're both jealous of not being able to use Aerowinx PSX - that's just that 😜

7 hours ago, rka said:

"We may add them someday"

For those who didn't click on the links to Ben's statements, this one was referring to the screen-space motion vectors needed for FSR2.0. What I found more interesting was the declaration that in the future they might add FSR2.0 "or other tech". There's more out there than just FSR/DLSS. Contrary to the opinions of some, LR does keep tabs on how these technologies develop.

As for Cameron, I've had no reason to doubt his interactions with Ben/LR. He wasn't trying to be a spokesperson for LR. He was reporting the developer weather. That the AA fixes are not 'trivial' is good enough for me.

It's impossible for anyone to take you seriously in these forums.  

First you say this...

3 hours ago, rka said:

Okay Goran. Who is Cameron XA and can he give official statements for Laminar Research?

Even when it's obvious who he is, due to the info on his profile.

And then you say this...

2 hours ago, rka said:

I know full well who Cameron is

Then you claim to "know full well" that I'm dodging the question about whether or not he can make statements for Laminar.  You go from 1 extreme to the other in these forums, and I sometimes ask myself, is it really worth it to respond to you, when even you don't know what you said 2 posts ago.  

If you want an answer, then my answer is I don't speak for other people.  So if you want to know, ask him.  All I posted was a link to a statement he made, and I assumed you could draw your answer from that.  Period.  The fact he said that he actually spoke to Ben Supnik about it, should be more than sufficient for you to draw your own, complete conclusion.

Maybe if you employ your MSFS persona in these X-Plane forums, things would likely change.  But all this hidden subtext in your statements, along with you being a "customer of Laminar Research", as indicated by your signature, tends to, as I said, persuade people not to take you seriously.  

Or maybe you're just baiting(?)

Just saying.

🙂

Edited January 27, 20233 yr by GoranM

1 hour ago, cagarini said:

They're both jealous of not being able to use Aerowinx PSX - that's just that 😜

How did you know????

😁

I very nearly bought a copy from a reseller close to where I live.  

Australia has a famous PSX reseller, and a great full mockup cockpit 🙂

I am looking fwd into XView for XP12....

 

Edited January 27, 20233 yr by cagarini

Without reading and having downloaded the last non beta xp12, bugs are still present:

- AA is completely broken on chrome etc.

- G1000 bugs

- Flightmodel is broken!-