St Mawgan

I've always loved it, right from the start. There is another update due in a few weeks but it has always been a special aircraft in MSFS.

If the decision is too challenging and potentially life changing for you, then just stick with 2020 and be happy. Life is too short to worry about it that much. Both give you access to good airplanes, both look pretty good, neither is anything like flying for real. Let us know what you decide, maybe in another 12 months?

The short answer is, those who have 32 are going to say 32 is enough, those who have 64 are going to say that 64 is better. 64 is better 😉

64 all day

v1.1 downloaded 17 minutes after you posted

Just downloaded my Cargo/Amphib fine.

My wife already gifts me aircraft via Paypal. No need for her to have MSFS too and then shout upstairs -'which one was it again?'

95% GA which is everything from the C172 to the C750. Occasionally the RJ or the F28. I did buy and try the 737-600 but didn't keep it.

Trust me if you had included FSX in the discussion there would still be those who would argue that it was better than 2020 and 2024 combined. A lot of people will swear blind that what they have is the best sim when they are ultimately just intimidated by the idea of change. People like what they like and you just have to take the plunge and see for yourself. Or not. What are you going to do - let the thread run for a week or so and then tally up the numbers before deciding?

This is what I see on Steam -

You aren't seeing the tons of threads saying how mind numbingly amazing it is? As I've said a million times since 2024, I switched on hour one of day one and have never given MSFS2020 a second thought since. But it was never something I was going to particularly agonize over to be honest. Don't forget, it's not an irreversible decision like getting your cat neutered. Try it. If you don't like it, uninstall it. Simple.

I'm glad that 2020 users are being used as beta testers for the rest of us 🙂

I'm 100% reserving judgement until this is released. 'Looks promising' is as enthusiastic as I'm going to get at this stage.

I wouldn't say mine feels heavy. Feels about right actually. It is super stable and a bit too easy to fly to keep it interesting for very long but, I wouldn't say it is particularly heavy.

Yes, I tried this the other day. Like a cross between the Zenith and the A-32.

Actually, not just on the surface.

Excellent, looks great. And I can finally say 'looks great' as I can now see the images 🙂

Bought it over the weekend and am very happy with it, just as I am with KMRY

'Accusimilar' sounds better.

It's one of those great add-ons I never actually fly. I've a few like that. Amazing but somehow, I never seem to 'reach' for them.

B200 MSFS2024 updated to version 1.0.2 Changelog: - Windshield wiper effect added - Improved altimeter behavior. - Improved contact points and damping. - Fixed heat effects. - Improved Auto-Feather. - Improved engine start-up sounds and indoor/outdoor transition sounds. - Fixed COMM 2 functionality. - Fixed radio knob animations. - Fixed fuel flow gauge behavior. - Improved power at low idle - Improved attitude indicator startup effect. - Improved ice and dirt effects. - Minor fixes in liveries. - Improved nose landing gear door animation. - Improved animation for inoperative switches - Fixed RPM control by Condition Levers

The hangar views are the only thing I would carry over if I could. The option to pan the camera around and sit in the cockpit before choosing the aircraft. I miss that.

You mean it looks as much like a 737 as the last one did?

Just Flight RJ - always makes me happy.

I shouldn't have to install another browser just for one site when every other MSFS forum and news site on the planet works just fine, so the solution is to just not view Avsim on my mobile. I have absolutely no problem with seeing adverts on a website but if they are so poorly implemented that they break it's functionality and I can't see the adverts or the website then there is no point going there.