3 hours ago, AviationEnthusiast said:

I watched a guy on youtube demonstrate the latest DLSS release and he specifically pointed out how little ghosting there was and I'm like... there's freaking ghosting all over the place! So I believe it when people say they don't see it.

Oh yes.... don't you love that guy. He's made a whole channel out of re-posting other people's tweaks (some good, some snake oil, but always just a rip from other people's videos).    He uses clickbait in the title / thumbnail like "updated version - no ghosting!" .... and as you said, you immediately see tons of ghosting in his video!

Anyway, yes, I agree with Christopher, I hope this "photgrammetry must be ON" requirements remains limited to some of Ini's airports.   I have never, ever had a good experience with photogrammetry.  I know some have.   The issue with PG is that it's data/bandwidth dependent in terms of how well it displays. I bought a couple of INI airports before I knew about this 'PG ON' thing...... and to be fair, they don't state that requirement, and have been fine.  I absolutely love Ini Leeds (EGNM). It's such a huge improvement on Orbx's V2 of EGNM.

Edited April 13, 20242 yr by JYW

1 hour ago, Christopher Low said:

I wonder what percentage of the MSFS userbase has PG disabled? That would be an interesting statistic.

Id imagine the majority as it defaults to on

I for one love the photogrammetry. The only city I get bad performance at is Frankfurt, but that could also be the airport 

Edited April 13, 20242 yr by Tuskin38

I purchased EGGW at the weekend and it really does have some serious terrain issues. I have been in touch with their support and have tried all sorts to get this right, Photogrammetry on/off, rebuilding scenery indexes, so far no joy. I think it may be a case of a refund