November 9, 20232 yr 1 hour ago, Franz007 said: At the same time of course, they cannot please everyone and I am fully aware of tha They are the ones you hear the most from on Forums. Wheter you like it or not ATC has bing a thorn in there side for years. as is multiplayer. This wont happen untill they get there networking improved which they now have someone dedicated to addressing. This would work well if you could have user ATC like we did in FSX. dont want perfection, dont need it. wont happen anyway.
November 10, 20232 yr Author 8 hours ago, jcomm said: Ok Murmur, you've done it ! I'm giving XP12 a new try... Another thing you should appreciate, improvements in magnetic variation and modeling of magnetic dip: https://www.x-plane.com/kb/x-plane-12-08-release-notes/#Magnetic_Compass_and_Friends "Society has become so fake that the truth actually bothers people".
November 10, 20232 yr 7 hours ago, Murmur said: Another thing you should appreciate, improvements in magnetic variation and modeling of magnetic dip: https://www.x-plane.com/kb/x-plane-12-08-release-notes/#Magnetic_Compass_and_Friends Indeed interesting. Some moons ago I tried to motivate Austin to it, as you probably remember... I was unsuccessful back then. Glad things changed and XP12 is now even more detailed in aspects that are surely NOT SECONDARY to FLIGHT SIMULATION. I downloaded the 12.08 beta, picked my preferred Boeing airliner for XP12 ( FF 757 ), an helicopter ( VSkyLabs R66 ) and the VSkyLabs DC-3. Took the 3 for short hops around LPPT, Real World Weather (XP12 default), but so far I wasn't able to properly test the new wheel physics. Now stuff like the new turbine modelling, as well as the "Magnetic Compass and Friends" added features and details, really requires a careful test, and I will try to find the time for it ! Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
November 10, 20232 yr Nice watching the NDB and VOR needles hunting around as they come into range. Love these refinements.
November 10, 20232 yr On 11/9/2023 at 9:22 PM, Murmur said: In theory, I think the new feature should be 100% retrocompatible. It is only of interest for supersonic aircraft, in any case. If anything, this new feature would allow greater accuracy throughout the flight envelope, for those who want to modify old aircraft to take advantage of it. If not, they should just fly in 12.0.8 as they already did before. Well, yes. I assume that X-Plane uses semi-sane defaults if nothing is set in the ACF and PlaneMaker reminds you to set the parameter when opening a pre-12.0.8 ACF file. And if one is totally lost, there now is a "Huh??" button that links to Austin's corresponding educational Youtube video. Still, changes that affect a substantial part of the flight envelope always make me anxious as testing their effect in X-Plane is a royal PITA, especially if one finds that some tweaking is indeed in order. And there is always the point of finding a source with usable real-world reference data... (Regardless, thanks anyway. Since you now have a hot wire to Austin, can you ask for a performance calculator in PlaneMaker that computes overall lift, thrust and drag with speed, altitude and throttle as input?) 7950X3D + 7900 XT + 64 GB + Linux | 4800H + RTX2060 + 32 GB + Linux My add-ons from my FS9/FSX days
November 10, 20232 yr 48 minutes ago, Bjoern said: performance calculator in PlaneMaker The most frustrating thing about this is that it's now buried in the sim as of this beta. For internal use. You're not the first to want this. I'm surprised he hasn't opened something like this up to devs a long time ago. My bet is that he's probably thinking "let them make plugins..." Friendly reminder: WHITELIST AVSIM IN YOUR AD-BLOCKER. Especially if you're on a modern CPU that can run a flight simulator well. These web servers aren't free...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.