Everything posted by UrgentSiesta
-
2026 Navigraph Survey Results for P3D
Agree totally with @simfan1983 you do need ActiveSky for real time weather. Otherwise itโs just static presets in P3D. I personally really like Orbx True Earth, and I have their other older stuff for the regions not covered by True Earth. if you buy it, wait for a sale - many time itโll go down to 40% off ๐๐
-
2026 Navigraph Survey Results for P3D
I have had remarkably few issues with either 2020 or 2024 (other than a few days after launch for both). Had a few with P3D, and a few with XP and DCS world. Nothings perfect. With MSFS I just donโt feel the need to buy airports. The ones that are included are adequate. And the freeware scene is just stunning - practically anywhere you might want to go, thereโs an above average airport that someoneโs made for you. And yeah, there are a few where I really want it to be โrightโ. Usually airports that I happen to know well. And Iโm willing to pay for them because they look more realistic than anything in any other sim. You donโt need fsuipc with MSFS, Xp, or DCS. Well, at least Iโve never run into an issue not having itโฆ You certainly donโt need ActiveSky - itโs built right in to the new sims. I say all this not to proclaim that one is better than the other, but rather that the only legit reason not to switch is the FSL Concorde. And I get it - for the longest time, I flew P3D for the MilViz T-38C & A, the PMDG 747-8i, the Majestic Q400, and the A2A Civ Mustang. After several years, other Hi Fi addons in other sims have now whittled that down to just the MilViz T-38C (which is the one they built for the IRL USAF) and the A2A Civ Mustang. Itโs looking to be at least several more years until the Civ Mustang comes, and the T-38C will never come because the USAF yanked them from public sale. So Iโll have P3D for quite awhile yet (and I still have all my P3D addons loaded and ready to go if I ever โneedโ them). But in the meantime, the other sims & addons are coming along nicely and each has their own nice experiences to offer. ๐ค
-
Upgrading to 2024 - which edition?
I bought the Aviator edition, mainly because I enjoy them for mostly historical reasons. BUT, most of them are still v2020 only and have a number of quirks in v2024. Previously, I bought 2020 Premium Deluxe for the Longitude and 787. And the extra handful of Hand Crafted airports give me a reason to fly atypical locations. I wouldโve bought v2024 PE for similar reasons (such as the C-17, et al). In sum, the simulator remains exactly the same across editions, and IIRC, all the World Update freebies have been released for all editions. So, if youโre interested in any of the extra aircraft or airfields, then yes. But if you only fly 3rd Party addons, then stick with Standard.
-
Binding App Won't Run (MSFS 2024)
Havenโt had a problem here. Sounds like your antivirus is interfering or the install went bad. In re your antipathy towards Discord, I say, โToo Badโ. And I say that as a guy who doesnโt even LIKE Discord. When I use it, I always use the web browser for access. Iโve never even had it installed. And when Iโve occasionally needed it for support from several developers, itโs been fine - even to an old geezer like me ๐๐ค After all, itโs not like FSW is telling you to send a letter or make a phone call ๐คฃ
-
A study level heloโฆ? You had me at โstudyโ
Have you folks decided on what the upgrade policy is? I havenโt seen anything definitive as yetโฆ
-
Here we go again - SIM FEDERATION Cessna Latitude
Oh yes, Iโm sure people will enjoy it. but for me, like I said above โ๏ธ๐๐
-
Here we go again - SIM FEDERATION Cessna Latitude
I meanโฆgiven the quality and significant overlap of the Longitude, Iโm not in the least tempted by stuff like this. Particularly with the Praetor and FSR Phenom โcoming soon(ish)โ.
-
Here we go again - SIM FEDERATION Cessna Latitude
I was just saying in another thread about warbirds that this is something I do, too (my filters are a little tighter - has to be at least a good addon). ๐๐
- Visuals 7/10, physics ?/10: the wake turbulence problem
-
A study level heloโฆ? You had me at โstudyโ
How soโฆ? theres no โportingโ between the sims, other than some of the 3D modelingโฆ
-
P-51D Mod Hefty Update
Uhโฆone can certainly compare and contrast! I will agree that the A2A and DCS Mustangs are significantly different, AND that the A2A seems to align more accurately with IRL pilot accounts, in particular for take off & landing. But Iโd also say that itโs inaccurate to state that โcombat simsโ ignore the โrealismโ in the features you mentioned. In fact, itโs all the time that Iโve spent in the DCS warbirds that have made the A2A and MSFS warbirds so easy for me (relatively easy!). So, yeah, some of the warbirds in MSFS are good, but Iโve yet to find any that are generally at the level of A2A or DCS. I do hold hope for the FIS Spitfire for 2024 upgrade to further enhance it, but TBH, Iโve kinda given up on civ sim warbirds for โstudy levelโ flying. I do collect the better ones that arenโt available in other sims, as itโs a very nice โdiscoveryโ experience, and I appreciate the effort to keep them alive in simulation. ๐ค
-
P-51D Mod Hefty Update
I took quick flights in them both yesterday. The core problem, as you say, is that weโve experience with the Crรจme de la Crรจme addons in other sims (and Iโll definitely add A2Aโs warbirds to that). So, yeah, these end up falling short relative to those. HOWEVER, I do feel like theyโre a very good experience for those who only fly MSFS. ๐๐ค
-
A study level heloโฆ? You had me at โstudyโ
@Daube Well, the good news is that Belatu reports it does actually work fine in v2024 except for some โminorโ things that simply donโt exist in v2020 (walk around, etc). ๐๐ Now, Iโm OCD enough that itโs still a No Go for me if thereโs no โfree upgradeโ* to v2024. even better, he says the physics are top tier (something he doesnโt say too often). Overall, Iโve yet to find a helo review of Belatuโs where Iโd feel like he steered me wrong. ๐ค The only thing I find overtly disappointing is the lack of ANY radio nav other than ADF(!). From DCS Russian helos, I do realize thatโs genuinely a thing, but still, at least an optional 430 would be greatly appreciated (ร la Just Flight ๐) * I normally donโt care about free updates, but only if Iโve gotten use in the original sim. I just donโt fly v2020 any longer, soโฆ
-
P-51D Mod Hefty Update
Havenโt flown it in ages, but the FIS Spitfire is quite well regarded - used as a trainer for IRL Spitfire flying!
-
2026 Navigraph Survey Results for P3D
Iโm fairly confident there are a โfewโ more of us left than just some hundreds ๐ if we are to conservatively believe Asobo, there might be as many as 10,000,000 MSFS โactiveโ players (or moreโฆ!). Spreading that math out means there likely at least 150,000 P3D playersโฆ? Given the extremely small sample size, and obvious (unavoidable) skews in the data, it could even be significantly higher. ๐ The only sad thing is that it does seem to be a steadily declining number, thoโฆ
-
A study level heloโฆ? You had me at โstudyโ
Yep - Iโve seen reporting that the 2024 version will be a separate purchase, implying no upgrade path(?). If so, Iโll have to wait for v2024 or clarification. Even then, itโd have to be a free upgrade to v2024 simply because I no longer fly in v2020. ๐ค
-
Looks Like I'll Return to 2020
Pump up your Rolling Cache (there is no limit other than disk space), and Install/Download the WUs, et al, and at least your favorite aircraft. Really very similar to v2020, and the end results are superior (if 2024 wasnโt materially better, I wouldnโt fly it) ๐ค
-
Looks Like I'll Return to 2020
Yep - I think that โminimum acceptable rather than desiredโ is the knee knocker for many folks. ๐ค I pretty much never fly over Manhattan, but tested this out the other day as itโs a tough place to maintain performance in every sim Iโve ever used. It also bypasses my Rolling Cache, etc. Still was able to maintain good performance with just a few micro-stutters (which are inevitable there, IMHO). ๐ค Question for you: is there info on how the adjustments are prioritized by the Dynamic settings?
-
Switching from MS24
Amen to all points ๐
-
Looks Like I'll Return to 2020
I was gonna say that Iโve had good results with the default dynamic settings. It could be that I use a very low minimum FPS of 45 (and I usually see far, far higher), large Rolling Cache, locally installed aircraft, airports, and other scenery. I have most settings set to a combo of High and Ultra, with a few Eye Candyโs set to Medium/Low. Good results with a minimum of stutters in dense locales ๐ค
-
Looks Like I'll Return to 2020
If you get the blurries as described, you need to make use of Rolling Cache and significantly increase its size on disk. ๐ค
-
FF 300 ER... Should I?
Sometimes it seems unreliable in terms Of seeing that thereโs updates available. But at least itโs never hosed an install for me across 3 different addons! ๐
-
Hotstart CL650 v1.9 available !
I still have v11 installed, with (because of) the TBM and I can barely stand launching it. ๐
-
XPlane.org - Our Woes continue
Austinโs losing a LOT of my money! ๐ While folks like to bash the MS Marketplace, Iโm finding it incredibly convenient to use vs keeping up with all the individual developers updates and such. Iโll agree with the desire for a somewhat higher level of curation than the MSMP offers, tho.
-
Switching from MS24
This had occurred to me later on specifically in relation to XP and that the survey DOUBLED its sample size this time. Thanks for bringing it up! ๐ and congrats on Challenger continuing on with such a high level of success!!๐ p..s.: howโs the TBM coming along ๐