June 11, 201610 yr ...personally I prefer the CJ2 with the GTN750 and the improvements done to the Autopilot etc. by Bert and the MOD squad. It seems to be more controllable and doesn't ' flake out ' as bad as the Hawker.... it is great for small airports and is pleasant to fly. I do like the Hawker but I don't think there is as good a MOD done to it by the team.... unless I don't have the latest MOD release and I'm missing out on something. If Carenado fixed the DTO function in the original CJ2 FMS and made it capable of saving and loading FlightPlans I would use it without the GTN750 and it would be adequate for Vatsim flying etc... I haven't noticed any issues with frame rates ....
June 11, 201610 yr CJ2 pips it for me..... exactly as @aerostar said. The mods make the AP more stable and predictable than that in the Hawker.. for me. Bill 😎 FS2024 • PMDG 738, 777F & 777-200LR • Fenix A319, A320, A321 • TFDi MD-11 • AS/ToLiss A346 • iFly 737 MAX8 • Ini A340 • AS CRJ v2 • Ini A300 Premium • FSS 727F • FFX HJET, Visionjet and P180 2024 • A2A Comanche 2024 & Aerostar • All BLACKSQUARE aircraft • COWS DA40 & DA42 • FSW C24R Sierra & C414 TrackIR • BeyondATC • PMS GTN Payware • RealTurb • Axis & Ohs • FS Realistic Pro 9800X3D • RTX 3080 • 64GB DDR5-6000 NPPL licence holder in the UK
Create an account or sign in to comment