Bigmack

All I can say to you is that if the only thing you can take away or complain out is a flight stick on a word not allowed good airplane, more power to ya. I'm enjoying the plane and the badly designed flight stick.

I guess we're flying 2 different Planes. The one I have the cockpit looks great. And the overhead is fine. The sidestick is a side stick. Doesn't look no more plastic or flat than any other of the buses.

I don't understand what's your problem with the cockpit textures. I have the INI 340 and Fenix Airbus and the cockpits quality all look the same to me. What quality issue are you having???

My load times are 1min 45secs at KJFK with AIG loading at the same time.

My point was to stop looking at the frame rate counter and enjoy the flight and performance the A340-600 has to offer. I've completed 2 flights from LFPG to CYYZ and it flew perfectly with no issues. I don't care what the frame rates were during flight, just the performance and system operation.

Who cares about what the frames are. Just jump in the plane and fly and enjoy.

I have to disagree, TC uses no more memory than any other addon program. I run it all the time for every flight and never saw a memory hit using TC.

You're living in La la land. 2020 needed just as many tweaks and changes as 2024. I don't see any cartoonish looks in 2024. If anything, 2020 graphics are less superior to 2024. When 2024 first release, I got of blurries, but now haven't experienced ant blurries since SU3. All my fling I get sharp crisp textures at all altitudes. Maybe just because you can't set up your rig correctly, don't blame 2024.

I totally disagree with you. Pay ware airports offer more realism and accuracy to anything default. Terminals don't look like barns with jetways attached to them and airlines are parked at the correct gates. Now I will agree with you on bush flying scenery, it's totally cool.

Yes, it is. The UI have come a long way since first released. Now it's very simple to use and don't require anymore special downloads from other websites.

Try KSAN to KSFO both airports available on Contrail

For one reason, I have many other apps running in the background that uses the Simbrief fP's from the downloader.

Have you posted this concern on their support forum?

No. I use the hub instead of using the EFB in aircraft. Because the installing Navdata using the EFB in the 777 won't work for me. Navigraph informed to just use the hub until PMDG or them figure out why.

Are you guys loading your Navdata using the Navigraph hub or the EFB?

That's funny. My ram usage average is about 55 to 65% with everything running. I guess windows is smart enough to cap your memory usage depending on how much you have installed. But I do know that after upping my ram to 64GB, 2024 is running a whole much smoother.

It works. I've done it several times. You have to look at your file structure where you move it to.

I moved my OCI to my addon linker drive folder when using for 2020. When 2024 released I didn't want to mix things up, so I let it install in my 2024 community folder. I check for AIG updates maybe every other week or once a month. It doesn't take long to update. You can move your OCI to whatever drive or folder you want, but I recommend putting it on your fastest SSD drive.

Ignore the errors tab. Just make sure you keep the FP's and models up to date. I have the full AIG world package installed. It doesn't take up that much HD space. But the best part is wherever I go in the world I see AI traffic. Airline and GA. Also, you can start TC at the same time as 2024. Go for the whole package and enjoy seeing AI all over the world.

Haven't had problems with loading fuel from the PMDG 737-700 EFB using SB flight plan. Or any PMDG aircraft.

AIG does include worldwide airlines at both SA, Asia and some GA traffic.

Not sure what made prices to increase the way they are now. But I'm glad I purchased my memory when I did. At these prices I hope I won't have to buy or replace any components any time soon. What a rip off for consumers.

I don't regret having 64 of ram. It makes my flight sim more study. With all my side programs running, my usage climb to 60% at times. 32 is okay but you will it a wall.

I agree. I hate people posting on old threads that's dated 6 months or longer. When it's just as easy to start a fresh announcemnt.

I also throw money in the wishing well, hoping Tolliss would redo the terrible Aerosoft A330 project or a Fenix A330 I'd hop on in a minute.