chiastra

Hi John don't know, I hope it stays the same with all the libraries as before. But no one will be able to upload any files. So it will be limited, no new files will be added. Andrea

Hello. I wrote that because I don't trust renovations. Flightsim was fine as it was. They said that the new Flightsim will be simpler, but it will remain the same as before. I suspect that this is an excuse because someone saw an opportunity to make money. They also said that uploading will no longer be possible, but that all the files will remain. I don't believe that at

You're right, FS Studio can only add tools, but it can't change the background. I'll have to put up with the distorted panel.

Thank PebbleBeach for your answer Is it possible with FSPanel Studio ?

Thanks chris_eve

Good morning, everyone. I wanted to try an ILS landing at Viracopos SBKP airport in Brazil, but without the ILS chart, I was unable to land, even after several attempts. Have any of you simmers tried landing at that airport in the past? Without the altitude to intercept the glide path, how could it be done? Thank you anyway. P.S.: Is it possible to attach something to a post? For example, a photo or a drawing? (but not from URL,from my PC)

For Hernandez and Hans J. I think Hans J. is right. The problem with that plane is that I use a 4:3 monitor. But its panel was designed for 16:9. Unfortunately, I have no way to test it with the correct monitor format, but I did find the right solution from the forum. Although I can't apply it yet, the product description on the site where I purchased it should have mentioned 16:9. Luckily, it was almost given away; in fact, it only costs €6.10. Amen Ciao

Thanks to all of you, I also actually think the problem lies in the monitor's format. As for the operating system, here in Italy there's still the option of having Win10, as there are companies that remanufacture it. As for my plane, I think I'll have to throw it in the trash. But the avsim forum is proving to be very good. Let's hope it doesn't die out like the flightsim forum. Talk to you later. Andrea

chris_eve This means that whatever resolution I choose doesn't apply to fs9, meaning there are no changes. Now I'd like to buy a PC with Win 10 installed, but I'm not sure if fs2004 will run as well as it does with Win 7. Which version of Win 10 will be best for fs2004? I know there are several, both 32-bit and 64-bit. What do you think?

Hi, I tried with three different PCs, but there's nothing to do. I don't understand why, but maybe it depends on the fact that I installed FS2004 in Win7, when it should be Win XP? The result is always the same for every resolution!

Hi Hernandez, I tried merging the panel you found, but it was another disaster. I'll try again, but I'm not optimistic. With patience.

My PC is a bit old, it's a Pentium D 820 with 4 GB DDR2 RAM. The graphics card is an Nvidia GeForce GT 1030.0 The possible resolutions are 34, from 800x600x32 to 1920x1080x16 with 32 intermediate values. But I noticed that by setting a different resolution, the FS2004 screen remains the same. Regardless of the value set. It seems a bit strange to me.

Hi Hernandez Thanks for the link you sent, which works. It seems to me that the only solution is the one in point 3 of your last reply. The difficulty will be the merge, which I tried a while back when merging a 767-757 with a nice panel made by Colacicco. The result was a disaster because there was no step-by-step explanation. The author forgot that an amateur couldn't handle it. Now I'll try choosing the right panel from your link, and I'll try patiently. If that fails, I'll turn to the forum again, hoping someone with experience merging panels can help. But I don't understand why Virtualcol did it in 16:9 when 4:3 was the standard back then. Ciao

The distorted panel only occurs with Jetstream31 from virtualcol.

Finally, virtualcol replied and sent me a link where I could download a version of the aircraft that should be compatible with FS2004. I downloaded and installed it, but nothing changed. The panel was still distorted! Fortunately, the aircraft was inexpensive, but I'm disappointed because it was a nice aircraft, within the limits of FS2004. My 4:3 monitor has several possible resolutions, but I can't say which one is native. However, I think the issue with the 16:9 panel should have been disclosed: I wouldn't have bought it. Redoing a panel is only for professionals, and that's not my case. Bye