<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Letters to the Editorial Staff of AVSIM Latest Topics</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/forum/118-letters-to-the-editorial-staff-of-avsim/</link><description>Letters to the Editorial Staff of AVSIM Latest Topics</description><language>en</language><item><title>Avsim do not process my personal info options</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/689168-avsim-do-not-process-my-personal-info-options/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	If this is in the wrong forum, I am sorry, I wasn't sure where to put it.
</p>

<p>
	When I come to avsim now a pop up (or whatever you call it) comes up asking me if I want to opt out of things. The title of the pop up is "AVSIM - Do Not Process My Personal Information". First, why am I getting this? and second, I cannot change any of the options in the opt out survey. And I get this survey thing EVERY TIME I COME TO AVSIM NOW! Can I only do it once?
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">689168</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 13:00:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Front page</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/663479-front-page/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I am logged in.  Is the "AVSIM Front Page" ever going to have anything else on it besides how the new login works. 
</p>

<p>
	  Miss that.
</p>

<p>
	Thanks
</p>

<p>
	Jim
</p>

<p>
	CYWG
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">663479</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2025 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>OS Forum restructure suggestion</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/657044-os-forum-restructure-suggestion/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	The current OS Forums under Hardware &amp; Operating Systems Discussions contents win7/8/10/11 which have very limited utilization IMO
</p>

<p>
	As X-Plane natively runs in MAC and Linux, and MSFS can run under Linux using Proton, the OS for sim flyer is not limited to windows anymore.
</p>

<p>
	For example, I'd like to migrate to Linux, however I don't know if P3D could run under it, where I could find such information? A dedicated Linux forum might be really helpful. While I don't use MAC, a MAC forum might also include Apple silicon hardware related issue.
</p>

<p>
	And while I use win7 until last year, which is very long after EOS, I don't think it's really needed to keep that forum as both win7 and 8 forum have no active for years. I'd suggest combine win7 and win8 forum, and maybe win10 forum later to a "Legacy windows OS Forum"  and let Win11/12 be "Current Windows OS". Or maybe just as P3D and MSFS forum, use the tag on one windows forum?
</p>

<p>
	To sum up, I'd like to have current 4 subforums of win7/8/10/11 be change to these 4 subforums:
</p>

<p>
	Current Windows OS
</p>

<p>
	Legacy Windows OS
</p>

<p>
	Linux OS (maybe include android?)
</p>

<p>
	MAC OS / Apple silicon Hardware
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">657044</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 07:38:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>7 Reasons Why MSFS20/24 Subforums Would Help Everyone</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/655913-7-reasons-why-msfs2024-subforums-would-help-everyone/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	One of the AVSIM Moderators has suggested that we post the logical reasons that the creation of two additional subforums, one for each of MSFS2020 and MSFS2024, within the Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020/2024) would help the user community. 
</p>

<p>
	While acknowledging that we are in an unusual period - with the recent introduction of MSFS2024 and the understandably disproportionate level of users seeking solutions to the difficulties they are encountering while climbing up a very steep learning curve - nevertheless, I would suggest that the logic for having two subforums remains the same beyond that peak.
</p>

<p>
	1.  <u>Microsoft, flight sim developers and users rely on community self-help</u>  As with the MS Windows Help system, it is generally other users who are the mainstay to solving technical and operational queries and difficulties.  Flight Simulation always has had, and probably will always have, a significant mix of technical and procedural challenges - and the speed in which this sector has been able to move from being a very specialist area to now having general public accessibility is remarkable.  And that speed is significantly due to the strength of this approach.
</p>

<p>
	2. <u>For Flight Simulation, AVSIM is unarguably one of the best examples of this</u>  It is, in my view, exceptional.  There are VERY few pc technical or flight-related issues where someone on the forum will not have the knowledge and willingness to help.  
</p>

<p>
	3.  <u>Flight Sims are complicated!</u>  To get them working efficiently, it needs a mix of pc-program related, software related, hardware related and flying related skills.  Most us will need help at some stage to get the best, and most satisfaction, out of this hobby - and particularly just to get started in the first place.
</p>

<p>
	4.  <u>MSFS2020 and MSFS2024 have fundamentally different technical approaches and PC infrastructure needs</u>  They both need a beefy CPU and GPU.  But, while decent streaming is always useful, you can - and many folks do - run MSFS2020 with an unreliable or slow internet connection.  MSFS2024 relies on fast and reliable internet.  I'm in the UK - and even here, 'fast and reliable internet' is something you seek to get, but don't necessarily expect to get.  There are many countries around the world where this will be even more the case.  And so...
</p>

<p>
	5. ...<u>I think MSFS2020 and MSFS2024 will probably co-exist for a long time </u>  I think that 2020 to 2024 will, indeed, become a logical upgrade path for those who have the technology infrastructure - but I think that there will be a large market remaining within those who don't
</p>

<p>
	6.  <u>The number of issues for MSFS2024 will reduce - but will always be high</u>  - in exactly the same way that MSFS2020 still has a significant level of new posts.  Even after the dust as settled (as it did also with MSFS2020 after the first year) THESE ARE COMPLICATED SIMULATORS WITH HIGH LEVELS OF NEW USERS, TECHNICAL IMPROVEMENTS AND CHANGE.  
</p>

<p>
	7.  <u>Seeing the wood for the trees</u>   As I said early on, the exceptionally high level of MSFS2024 posts, presently, is at an artificial high and, without consistent tagging and filtering facilities of those tags, it is - certainly for myself at the moment - unusable to quickly browse and spot a topic where I could offer suggestions to other users on topics I have experience of, or spot a topic where I also am facing the same difficulty.  I think the first topic that had any relevance to me this morning was Page26.    But, even once the dust has settled, there will continue to be significant levels of query and folks seeking help on both Simulators.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	I hope that the above makes sense and, with thanks for their time taken to read this - and for presiding over such a splendid forum - I hope that the Administrators will reconsider their decision.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	AJR
</p>

<p>
	   
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">655913</guid><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:56:27 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>FS 20 and 24 forums</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/655766-fs-20-and-24-forums/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I am not sure if this is right category for this subject, but I will white it here anyway.
</p>

<p>
	IMO we really need separate forums for FS 2020 and FS2024. Now their shared forum here is full of posts about 24 and there are alot of us flying with 2020.
</p>

<p>
	Would you please consider to arrange them separately.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">655766</guid><pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:22:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Thirty plus years in the writing</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/639993-thirty-plus-years-in-the-writing/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	I really should have addressed this letter to PC Pilot, having been randomly reading that magazine for many years since the days of Windows 3.1, but have yet
</p>

<p>
	to invest any hard cash in flight simulation due to 'trying to hit a moving target':,
</p>

<p>
	The only flight simulator I ever had on my first 386 SX computer with  Windows 3.1 was a Dos-based sim on a floppy disk. I can't remember the name but I think it was
</p>

<p>
	based in Bristol and you could fly under a red suspension bridge if I remember correctly.
</p>

<p>
	Then MSFS.came along and I soon discovered that I would need an unaffordably expensive PC to go with it. I also realised that you needed a fair amount of
</p>

<p>
	computer skills to set it up and to keep it running properly as updates came along and computer hardware upgrades were also needed to keep up with the
</p>

<p>
	software improvements. 
</p>

<p>
	Hence the remark about 'moving targets' - there never seemed to a a right time to invest. Running a domestic flight simulator seemed to be a solitary hobby,
</p>

<p>
	forking out for upgrades without local help.to make them work.
</p>

<p>
	One of my worries was having to keep spending more and more cash on this hobby - if I had decided to become a pianist for example. it would have a one off
</p>

<p>
	payment for a piano to set myself up for life,
</p>

<p>
	So I never did take the plunge and become a flight simmer in all the intervening years to date and an irony is that in those intervening years I learned to fly
</p>

<p>
	and got my Private Pilots Licence!.
</p>

<p>
	Now I see MSFS has been established on XBOX.
</p>

<p>
	No doubt long-establised simmers will not give it much consideration, but it sounds ideal for me, sort of plug and play?
</p>

<p>
	In the short term, I would be able to just get on with enjoying the "game" just like switching on the TV and changing a few buttons on the remote.
</p>

<p>
	As I said at the beginning, I am always browsing PC Pilot  for help in getting started, even at XBOX level,  but the content seems to be all about preaching to the converted.
</p>

<p>
	How the hobby is going to attract new blood when there is so little guidance for a beginner on the bookshelves I have no idea.
</p>

<p>
	It is too late for me to start thinking about multi-screen cockpit layouts now, as I am in my mid eighties now but I would consider dying while trying to land a Cessna 152 
</p>

<p>
	sitting in my armchair.
</p>

<p>
	Brianivor
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">639993</guid><pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2023 21:09:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Avsim and Malwarebytes Pro</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/624267-avsim-and-malwarebytes-pro/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Starting this morning evertime I change a page here at Avsim, Malwarebytes is blocking 5 different instances of Google Analytics stuff. This is even though I am running Adblock Pro. Has something changed here or at Malwarebytes? The 5 popups on every page is starting to get annoying. 
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">624267</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:45:20 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Ads on Mobile Site - Can't login</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/614227-ads-on-mobile-site-cant-login/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Unsure if this is Avsim or an issue with my phone, but the level of advertisements has become so OTT, I can no longer login to the forums.
</p>

<p>
	The sign-in is hidden behind the ad and I can't scroll to it to press it. Any advice?
</p>

<p>
	Thanks
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="spacer.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="216.41" height="1000" style="height:auto;" width="462" data-src="https://i.ibb.co/bRMNJ06/IMG-8437-1.png" src="https://dev.avsim.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">614227</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2022 14:40:31 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Ads on This Site Will Finish You</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/615372-the-ads-on-this-site-will-finish-you/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	                  Impossible to type On an android device  .    You will lose   everyone eventually .      Change your system for Gods sake ...    look at the stte of this typing.    i cant be bothered to goback and faff about.    What an utter  clustur f# %^  
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">615372</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:54:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>A Modest Proposal for Accommodating P3D Users</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/613083-a-modest-proposal-for-accommodating-p3d-users/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	The flight simulation hobby has been split into two very different communities in a way we haven't seen before. This is not news or a criticism, just a recognition of fact. As we all know, before MSFS 2020, Flight Simulator X dominated. There were those who preferred to continue in FS9, and X-Plane was around then, too, At some point, there were even early adopters of P3D. But most of the traffic here was relevant to FSX. AVSIM remained focused on a single major platform: the latest iteration of the Microsoft Flight Simulator, and I mean not just in name, but (for better or worse) in the code and third-party products. I really don't know if "nearly everybody" has switched to MSFS 2020 (as I read from one dev recently). Perhaps some disinterested party can provide accurate figures. The issue remains the same, however, whether MSFS 2020 has garnered, say 90% of the hobby or even 75%, The community is still split in a way I don't recall seeing before. Some topics are just not going to be relevant to all platforms, while others are unaffected (Hanger Chat being the most obvious example).
</p>

<p>
	The easiest way to service the ever-dwindling number of P3D users would be relax the posting standards in the P3D forum. I think this is already happening some. In other words, P3D users should have the blessing to address<em> all </em>P3D issues in the P3D forum. If the P3D user base is insignificant and actuarial table-challenged, I don't see why this would cause congestion. Something like a CTD might have completely different causes and resolutions between P3D and MSFS 2020. With nearly no new products being developed for P3D (nearly everyone having switched) reviews of anything that did happen to come out for P3D could be placed in the P3D forum. Again, this would not cause undue traffic or confusion since they would be so rare.
</p>

<p>
	I don't think AVSIM should have to reconfigure its boards to accommodate P3D users. I think that P3D should be simply treated the same as X-Plane and be a safe space for P3D users to discuss <em>everything</em> concerning their platform. (Yes, I know there are non-binary users who enjoy both P3D and MSFS, but that doesn't change the argument.)
</p>

<p>
	Happy New Year and God Bless Us One and All
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">613083</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 17:10:44 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Could we have the other comment reacts?</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/602238-could-we-have-the-other-comment-reacts/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Hope this is the right forum for this. I know this is a mundane thing but thought I would try anyway <span class="ipsEmoji">😀</span> 
</p>

<p>
	Was wondering if it was possible to have more reacts? On Avsim theres only two available for a comment:
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="oOy9Yd3.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="45.45" height="75" width="165" src="https://www.avsim.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/oOy9Yd3.png"></p>

<p>
	From another flight sim forum:
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="ATBlT4h.png" class="ipsImage" data-ratio="41.15" height="107" width="260" src="https://www.avsim.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/ATBlT4h.png"></p>

<p>
	Its handy to see the range of reacts to a comment which helps convey the vibe of it like on social media platforms (funny / confused / sad / upvote / excellent comment! / love)
</p>

<p>
	Again, I know - not the end of the world if they arent present but I was just wondering. Thank you!
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">602238</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 23:02:04 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Browser not loading AVSIM site.</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/605085-browser-not-loading-avsim-site/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Was having issues getting AVSIM to show on my browser, looks like all it well now.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">605085</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 19:48:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Wilco Publishing</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/599368-wilco-publishing/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	What happened to the Wilco Publishing / FeelThere forum section?
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">599368</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:51:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Interest in RAF Br&#xFC;ggen scenery for P3Dv4.*?</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/593830-interest-in-raf-br%C3%BCggen-scenery-for-p3dv4/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Hi everybody,
</p>

<p>
	I'd be interested in knowing if anybody would like to have the option to download RAF Brüggen from the AVSIM download site. RAF Brüggen is close to release but as yet I have no answer of the AVSIM team to do so.
</p>

<p>
	Any feedback is much appreciated.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">593830</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2021 17:21:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>My Golden Rule for Flight Sim Discussions</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/590586-my-golden-rule-for-flight-sim-discussions/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Ladies and Gentlemen, may I be so bold as to invite you to consider one thing when we come here to share our common interests?
</p>

<p>
	I think it is in poor taste for a child to make fun of another child's favorite toys. It's one thing to discuss one's own toys, but why criticize something that's not to your taste, but that is bringing someone else enjoyment? None of this is really so serious to risk controversy and hurt feelings, is it? If we have not learned that much perspective this year, I don't know what we can learn. Again, if you have a product and use it, talk about it however you wish. I have P3Dv5.1 HF1, and I use it, so I enjoy reading about what's good and what improvements me might expect, or are disappointed not to find yet, and how to get the most out of it. I also have MSFS2020, which I don't use so much right now, because I happen to pretend I'm an airline captain and there's just not much opportunity for me there. It is pretty amazing, though and there are many who enjoy it as it is and that's fine. It's true that MSFS2020 came as a tsunami and changed the landscape of flight simulation overnight. This, along with the challenges LM has thrown at developers and users raise questions about the future of our hobby. These are legitimate issues. Both platforms are clearly works in progress. But I think there's good reason to suppose both are going to be around for some time to come and continue to improve. Market forces will determine what's available for each, and I don't think anyone--<em>anyone</em>, no matter how highly placed in what I suppose could be called "the industry" with a straight face--can predict the future.
</p>

<p>
	There are always going to be currents of opinion, and some are so ancient that they will continue along their channels no matter what. Learning to navigate those skillfully makes for a better experience for everyone. I'm not trying to chill speech here. And defending murderers for a living gives you a pretty thick skin and, I'll admit, a penchant for defense, rather than prosecution. Of course, anyone may say what they like. I'm not the arbiter of good taste or a moderator. (A job I don't envy.). All I can do is provide my own perspective, which is this: be considerate to others and respect what brings them enjoyment. If the only comment you can make is a drive-by criticism, maybe stop and think for five seconds before you hit the send button. This is a game for almost all of us (and the few devs who post, for whom it is also a business, are a pretty careful lot).
</p>

<p>
	I like my toys. You like yours. There's room for everybody. Let's play nice.
</p>

<p>
	Here are two seasonal movies I recommend that you won't have heard of. You might enjoy them, which would make me happy. Bachelor Mother with Ginger Rogers (of course) and David Niven, and Return of the Cat People, by the amazing and forgotten Val Lewton, who made wonderful movies the studio burdened with horrible titles. (I Walked with a Zombie is an even worse title; a good movie, but perhaps for a different season.) And if you enjoy It's a Wonderful Life, that's fine with me. I won't say a word.
</p>

<p>
	Tim Capps
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">590586</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:20:16 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>File list email</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/587123-file-list-email/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Hi,
</p>

<p>
	I hope this is the right place to mention this, but since MSFS2020 has been showing up in the daily new file list email, fs2004 new files seem to be dropped from the email.  I went and looked and there are still files being uploaded to the section but I'm not seeing them in the daily email.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Thanks,
</p>

<p>
	Sean Roe
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">587123</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:09:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Where on earth is the "Ignore" Button?</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/586297-where-on-earth-is-the-ignore-button/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I've used it twice before, over the years, so I know its around, but I can't find it now. <span class="ipsEmoji">😕</span>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">586297</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 22:40:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Quoting full posts in their entirety</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/585268-quoting-full-posts-in-their-entirety/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	I wonder if we can have some sort of "campaign" to encourage members NOT to quote an entire post, only the relevant part they wish to comment on or draw attention to? We are talking the lengthy posts here of course..
</p>

<p>
	I am seeing more and more of this occurrence recently. I am viewing AVSIM on my PC and not a mobile device so I can rapidly scroll down pas the post, but still, it would be nice not to have to do that on a frequent basis.
</p>

<p>
	It would save the mods a bit of time I think not having to edit lengthy requotes...
</p>

<p>
	Thanks.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">585268</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 14:21:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Please stop blocking Grammarly</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/576511-please-stop-blocking-grammarly/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	I am not sure what changes were made, but please undo blocking Grammarly. 
</p>

<p>
	My eyes aren't what they use to be and my fat fingers will sometimes hit the wrong key. Not only does Grammarly help me catch typos but is also provides feedback on tone. The tone checking helps me in writing to make sure that my intended positive comments actually sound positive. Why you would want to block an application that helps people sound more pleasant?
</p>

<p>
	Grammarly states it has access, but for some reason all of its features are disabled in your WYSIWYG interface. 
</p>

<p>
	Thank you,
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">576511</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2020 22:25:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Alpha Testers</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/578611-alpha-testers/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Dear Team,
</p>

<p>
	I refer to the Avsim T's &amp; C's..
</p>

<p>
	<span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:13px;">»</span><strong style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:13px;"><span> </span>BETA Testers:<span> </span></strong><span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:13px;">If you agree to be a BETA Tester for a commercial entity, your status and use of AVSIM changes. You are not permitted to post images of the product you are BETA testing. You are not permitted to reveal or communicate details of the product you are testing. You are not permitted to be a "proxy" for the commercial vendor. Only after it has been publicly announced that BETA testing is over<span> </span></span><strong style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:13px;">AND an imminent release date for the product has been announced</strong><span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:13px;">, can you post images, discuss the product and answer questions from other users. BETA Testers who post material for a product that is not to be released in a week or two from their post will be considered as a violation of our commercial advertising policies.</span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:13px;">Does this rule also refer to Alpha Testers, or do the moderators differentiate between Alpha &amp; Beta discussions.? Your moderators seem to be condoning breaches of the rule.</span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:13px;">If there is such differentiation, is this not against the spirit of the T's &amp; C's of Avsim? </span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#353c41;font-size:13px;">I hope that I am not breaching Avsim's Freedom of Speach T's &amp; C's by asking this question and I look forward to your response.</span>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">578611</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 21:44:24 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The &#x201C;like&#x201D; feature</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/575712-the-%E2%80%9Clike%E2%80%9D-feature/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Any thoughts on changing the “like” feature symbol...The heart thing is really odd, be nice to change from the heart to something else like a thumbs up or something <span class="ipsEmoji">😃</span>
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">575712</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 22:53:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Donations</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/507675-donations/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	I don't think it is right to post how much people have or have not donated to AVSIM. That is a personal thing.  The number is in their profile for members to see and should be removed.
</p>

<p>
	Jim
</p>

<p>
	CYWG
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">507675</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 02:20:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>List of uploads</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/571898-list-of-uploads/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Hi,
</p>

<p>
	I can not find a list of my uploads. The only way I know is to search the library. Like other forums on the web, it would be nice to have in the account all the info about my loads, IDs included.
</p>

<p>
	I uploaded a pack with error. I had to write to lib mngr, he asked for info I do not know how to get, I had to write him back asking for help how to answer him, etc... There must be a better way.
</p>

<p>
	Thank you,
</p>

<p>
	Florin.
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">571898</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:24:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>News on Avsim</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/534262-news-on-avsim/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I just noticed the last news article was from March 23rd. A week ago. Why is it other flight sim websites have much more and frequent news about software, upcoming releases, new releases, etc... If news isn't important why not just make this a place for forums? Reviews could be inside forum posts. I seriously doubt that anyone relies on this site for news as there really is not much of it. 
</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">534262</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 21:53:07 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Iimages in recent reviews not showing</title><link>https://dev.avsim.com/forums/topic/518194-iimages-in-recent-reviews-not-showing/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>
	Hi,
</p>

<p>
	I read a view recent reviews, like the one of the Xtreme Prototype GLJ 25, but none of the pictures are showing.<br />
	If you change the following path in the page source, they will show up:
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://dev.avsim.com/uploads/pages_media" rel=""><span style="color:#c0392b;">https://www.avsim.com/uploads/pages_media</span></a><br />
	to<br /><a href="https://dev.avsim.com/files/forum/pages_media" rel=""><span style="color:#27ae60;">https://www.avsim.com/files/forum/pages_media</span></a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">518194</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
